Discussion # 2, Hist 1.1: Egyptian Empire
- Due Jan 27, 2018 by 11:59pm
- Points 6
- Submitting a discussion post
- Available until Jan 30, 2018 at 11:59pm
Topic:
Egyptian civilization was made possible by the Nile River. The towns and villages along the Nile coalesced into small territories that were eventually organized into the Egyptian Kingdom by 3,000 BCE. Egyptian society seems to have been more stable than that of Mesopotamia and its worldview more optimistic. Egyptian life focused on family, farming, and the cycles of the Nile.
Although the political history of ancient Egypt can be described as more stable and secure than it's neighbors, there existed strong economic and diplomatic ties to the states that surrounded Egypt. To the East were the powerful states of Mesopotamia and to the South of Egypt, the Nubians created a number of important states, including the kingdoms of Kush and Meroƫ. Egypt had to adapt and decide whether to conduct peaceful relations with its neighbors or to expand its power and influence through conquest.
Directions: Two Points of View
Read your textbook and notes, do some careful research, and watch the videos. This involves some role-playing: Pretend you are an adviser to the ruler of Egypt and he is asking for advice about expanding into other territories. Advise the ruler to conquer neighboring territories and explain why this is necessary. How would this expansion benefit your ruler, your people, and your economy? Would there be any benefit to the conquered people?
This post is your opinion and there is no right or wrong answer. Your points will be based on completion of the assignment (based on the rubric) and whether you use support from the text, lecture, or internet. 6 points total, 3 for your initial post and 3 for replying to someone's post. Your post should be about a paragraph long and your reply to someone's post should be a paragraph as well.
I recommend that you create your initial post by Jan 26, at 11:59 pm so that others may have an opportunity to reply.
You must also contribute a Response to 1 classmate's post: Read another student's post and pretend you are another adviser to the same ruler and you disagree with the idea of becoming an aggressive empire. Respond to the points made by the other adviser and add your own ideas about how to become stronger through peaceful alliances and trade instead of conquest.
Posts can have more than one reply. Follow the netiquette guidelines below and use evidence to support or disagree with the original post. This is not a place for insults or arguments so use proper language such as "Your are a very wise, but I think that ..."
Your Response is due by Jan 27, at 11:59 pm.
- Turning this assignment in late will result in a loss of 1 point per day, up to 3 days allowed.
- Click on the reply button, below to get started.
Purpose:
To evaluate student's critical analysis of historical events.
Rubric:
To view the rubric attached to this discussion, click on the gear box in the upper right and select Show Rubric.
Netiquette:
- Be kind and respectful to others
- Use full sentences
- Avoid jargon and acronyms
- Use language that supports others
Rubric
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Original Discussion Post
This is the original post created by each student. The student must address the question or issue posited by the instructor.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||
Response to Peer's Post
Each student must post a response to at one other person's post. The response must be a paragraph long and meet the required standards.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||
Total Points:
6
out of 6
|