Microgreens Final Write Up
- Due Mar 30 by 8:59pm
- Points 20
- Submitting a website url
- Available Jan 14 at 12pm - Apr 6 at 11:59pm
Data Entry Links to an external site.
The goal of our microgreens project was to learn more about the process of science ( and grow some plants along the way). Please answer the following questions.
Type your answers into this Google Doc Links to an external site.and submit a link with Edit privileges
I will not grade AI material. I will not grade without Edit privileges.
- What was our hypothesis ? Remember, a hypothesis will include the statement ‘’because”. microgreen seedlings get nutrients from the cotyledons not the soil.
- Prediction: if your hypothesis was true, what did you predict would happen? the microgreens grown in vermiculite would yield the same as those grown in soil. ( or with soil + fertilizer)
- Data:
-
- This is where you insert the data you analyzed fromthis Google Sheet. Links to an external site.
- This should include a table with the analyzed data ( i.e. the averages, not the raw numbers), as well as the graph that you made.
- you might want to look at the range of weights for each treatment
- A few sentences summarizing what your graph depicts.
- INIWIRMO : Summarize your observations of the microgreens over the two weeks.
- INIWIRMO :What are 2 questions that you posed about the microgreens over the course of these two weeks
- INIWIRMO :What are 2 connections that you can make to other agricultural or biological phenomenon.
- Conclusion about hypothesis: these should be full sentences with information to back up your statement.
-
- Does your observation/data match your prediction?
- Do you feel like you supported your hypothesis?
- What were some questions that we had about our experimental set up?
- What might account for the variability in our data (the wide range of weights for both control and experimental)?
- Were there any confounding factors/bias in our methods?
- What evidence is there that the confounding factor you proposes is a good explanation for our data?
- Do you think that competition does make a difference? What changes would you make to our experimental set up to test the impact of competition?
- What does this tell us about the biology of the microgreens or plants in general?
- Next Steps: We made observations over the course of the experiment. Was there anything that jumped out at you about the growth of the two different treatments? What are other factors that you think impact the yield from the microgreen containers? What would you suggest that next semester’s students investigate?
Rubric
Please include a title
Keep in mind that 18 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
---|---|---|
Hypothesis and Prediction
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
Data
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
Conclusion
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
Next Steps
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
INIWIRMO
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|