Clever attention getting introduction that
“hooks” the audience.
o Ideas connected by original transitions,
logical throughout, creative pattern.
o Use of logical, ethical, emotional appeals
to enhance specific tone and purpose.
o The training provided the audience with
knowledge or skills that will improve law
enforcement service to the community.
Topic of presentation and training goals
are stated clearly.
o Information presented in a logical and
orderly sequence.
o Supporting materials reinforce key points.
o Conclusion is stated clearly.
o Presentation completed within specified
time limitations
No introduction or goals stated.
o No logical sequence or disjointed
presentation.
o Content was irrelevant or no references
or data used to support presentation
o No conclusion or conclusion does not
support presentation.
o Exceeded Specified Presentation Time.
blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
Speaker was extremely articulate; each
word was spoken with purpose.
o Speaker was enjoyable to hear; used
expression and intonation with purpose.
o Speaker was passionate about the topic
and presentation.
Speaker is easy to understand.
o Tone was conversational, but with
purpose.
o Voice sounded natural.
o Words were pronounced correctly and
without verbal fillers.
Posture was commanding and
professional.
o Speaker made regular eye contact with
all members of the audience.
o Speaker moved and was positioned with
purpose.
o Attire was exceptionally neat.
Attire was professional, neat, clean
Posture conveyed confidence.
o Speaker moved around the room,
gestures effective.
o Speaker appeared prepared and
confident.
Provided demonstration of a custom
or tradition.
o Provided a demonstration of a
special need.
o Provided a handout with information
from a supporting organization.
o Immersion included more than one
event or activity.
o Immersion was extraordinary and
included actual participation.
o Brought a member of the culture as a
guest speaker.
o Demonstrates a sincere, complete,
and profound level of self-awareness
of the assignment’s affect.
Appropriate culture selected.
o Included face-to-face interviews with
at least three different members of
the culture or supporting
organization.
o Included evidence of immersion.
o A description of the customs and traditions of the culture.
o Included stereotypes of the culture before beginning the assignment compared to what you found in your research and immersion experience.
o Included special needs of the culture.
o Included how the experience impacted the student.
Culture presented was not
approved.
o No mention of traditions or
customs.
o No special needs mentioned.
o No supporting organization
identified.
o Less than three members of the
culture interviewed.
o No evidence of immersion.
o Content was irrelevant.
o Makes no comment about how the
assignment impacted the student.
_3246
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
Presentation was exciting, creative,
and left the audience wanting more.
o Speaker demonstrated how they
benefited from the experience.
o Speaker used a variety of methods
during the presentation.
Speaker appeared to believe strongly
in message and demonstrated a
desire to have the audience listen,
understand, and remember.
o Speaker interacted with the
audience.
No multimedia, visuals, handouts,
or other supporting material was
used in the presentation.
o The supporting material that was
used in the presentation was
irrelevant or inappropriate
_7158
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
Find Rubric
